↓ Skip to main content

Confirmed early myocardial rupture in a patient with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) following late presentation of ST elevation myocardial infarction

Overview of attention for article published in Echo Research & Practice, April 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
14 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Confirmed early myocardial rupture in a patient with pulseless electrical activity (PEA) following late presentation of ST elevation myocardial infarction
Published in
Echo Research & Practice, April 2017
DOI 10.1530/erp-17-0007
Pubmed ID
Authors

Baskar Sekar, Joe Martins, Sanjiv Petkar

Abstract

A 69 year old male, an ex-smoker, was admitted with ongoing chest pain of 11 hours duration. Past medical history included treated hypertension and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. He delayed seeking medical attention as he assumed the pain to be due to indigestion and kept taking antacids without much symptomatic relief. Clinical examination on arrival was unremarkable. Admission 12 lead electrocardiogram (ECG) was diagnostic of a recent anterolateral myocardial infarction (MI) (Figure 1a). Bedside trans-thoracic echocardiogram (TTE) confirmed an established anterolateral MI (Video 1, Figure 1b). Unfortunately, en route to the cardiac catheter laboratory for a primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI), he suffered a cardiac arrest, due to pulseless electrical activity. An urgent repeat TTE confirmed significant pericardial effusion due to myocardial rupture with thrombus in the left ventricular apex (Figure 1c, Video 2). Attempts at resuscitating him were unsuccessful. It is rare to see and confirm a diagnosis of early myocardial rupture outside the autopsy room, as it is an extremely serious and lethal mechanical complication of acute MI. PEA in a patient with a first MI and without overt heart failure has a high predictive accuracy for this diagnosis. Anterior location of MI, age >70 years, and female sex are risk factors for myocardial rupture, while a patent infarct related artery, either after PPCI or fibrinolytic therapy appears to be protective. As in this case, when time allows, TTE plays an invaluable role in diagnosing this condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 May 2017.
All research outputs
#4,281,274
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Echo Research & Practice
#100
of 268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,679
of 323,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Echo Research & Practice
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.