↓ Skip to main content

Low-dose CT reconstruction via L1 dictionary learning regularization using iteratively reweighted least-squares

Overview of attention for article published in BioMedical Engineering OnLine, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Low-dose CT reconstruction via L1 dictionary learning regularization using iteratively reweighted least-squares
Published in
BioMedical Engineering OnLine, June 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12938-016-0193-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cheng Zhang, Tao Zhang, Ming Li, Chengtao Peng, Zhaobang Liu, Jian Zheng

Abstract

In order to reduce the radiation dose of CT (computed tomography), compressed sensing theory has been a hot topic since it provides the possibility of a high quality recovery from the sparse sampling data. Recently, the algorithm based on DL (dictionary learning) was developed to deal with the sparse CT reconstruction problem. However, the existing DL algorithm focuses on the minimization problem with the L2-norm regularization term, which leads to reconstruction quality deteriorating while the sampling rate declines further. Therefore, it is essential to improve the DL method to meet the demand of more dose reduction. In this paper, we replaced the L2-norm regularization term with the L1-norm one. It is expected that the proposed L1-DL method could alleviate the over-smoothing effect of the L2-minimization and reserve more image details. The proposed algorithm solves the L1-minimization problem by a weighting strategy, solving the new weighted L2-minimization problem based on IRLS (iteratively reweighted least squares). Through the numerical simulation, the proposed algorithm is compared with the existing DL method (adaptive dictionary based statistical iterative reconstruction, ADSIR) and other two typical compressed sensing algorithms. It is revealed that the proposed algorithm is more accurate than the other algorithms especially when further reducing the sampling rate or increasing the noise. The proposed L1-DL algorithm can utilize more prior information of image sparsity than ADSIR. By transforming the L2-norm regularization term of ADSIR with the L1-norm one and solving the L1-minimization problem by IRLS strategy, L1-DL could reconstruct the image more exactly.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 17%
Researcher 4 17%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Other 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 5 22%
Unknown 3 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 9 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Mathematics 3 13%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,966,001
of 22,971,207 outputs
Outputs from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#66
of 824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,512
of 354,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BioMedical Engineering OnLine
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,971,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 824 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.