↓ Skip to main content

Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction with treatment as usual in reducing psychological distress in patients with lung cancer and their partners…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Cancer, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial comparing Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction with treatment as usual in reducing psychological distress in patients with lung cancer and their partners: the MILON study
Published in
BMC Cancer, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2407-14-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Melanie PJ Schellekens, Desiree GM van den Hurk, Judith B Prins, Johan Molema, A Rogier T Donders, Willem H Woertman, Miep A van der Drift, Anne EM Speckens

Abstract

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide and characterized by a poor prognosis. It has a major impact on the psychological wellbeing of patients and their partners. Recently, it has been shown that Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction (MBSR) is effective in reducing anxiety and depressive symptoms in cancer patients. The generalization of these results is limited since most participants were female patients with breast cancer. Moreover, only one study examined the effectiveness of MBSR in partners of cancer patients. Therefore, in the present trial we study the effectiveness of MBSR versus treatment as usual (TAU) in patients with lung cancer and their partners.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 350 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 14%
Student > Master 46 13%
Student > Bachelor 43 12%
Researcher 32 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 28 8%
Other 74 21%
Unknown 79 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 114 32%
Medicine and Dentistry 60 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 36 10%
Social Sciences 14 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 30 8%
Unknown 91 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2020.
All research outputs
#7,873,317
of 25,632,496 outputs
Outputs from BMC Cancer
#2,078
of 9,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,803
of 319,980 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Cancer
#22
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,632,496 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,026 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 319,980 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.