You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Closed Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability test (CKCUES test): a reliability study in persons with and without shoulder impingement syndrome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-15-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Helga Tatiana Tucci, Jaqueline Martins, Guilherme de Carvalho Sposito, Paula Maria Ferreira Camarini, Anamaria Siriani de Oliveira |
| Abstract |
The Close Kinetic Chain Upper Extremity Stability Test (CKCUES test) is a low cost shoulder functional test that could be considered as a complementary and objective clinical outcome for shoulder performance evaluation. However, its reliability was tested only in recreational athletes' males and there are no studies comparing scores between sedentary and active samples. The purpose was to examine inter and intrasession reliability of CKCUES Test for samples of sedentary male and female with (SIS), for samples of sedentary healthy male and female, and for male and female samples of healthy upper extremity sport specific recreational athletes. Other purpose was to compare scores within sedentary and within recreational athletes samples of same gender. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 40% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Germany | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 3 | 30% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 449 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 443 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 81 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 72 | 16% |
| Other | 26 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 26 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 6% |
| Other | 88 | 20% |
| Unknown | 131 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 98 | 22% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 19% |
| Sports and Recreations | 57 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 33 | 7% |
| Unknown | 155 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2021.
All research outputs
#4,646,489
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#923
of 4,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#54,598
of 308,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#15
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,162 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.