↓ Skip to main content

Axonal BACE1 dynamics and targeting in hippocampal neurons: a role for Rab11 GTPase

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Neurodegeneration, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
1 YouTube creator

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Axonal BACE1 dynamics and targeting in hippocampal neurons: a role for Rab11 GTPase
Published in
Molecular Neurodegeneration, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1750-1326-9-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Virginie Buggia-Prévot, Celia G Fernandez, Sean Riordan, Kulandaivelu S Vetrivel, Jelita Roseman, Jack Waters, Vytautas P Bindokas, Robert Vassar, Gopal Thinakaran

Abstract

BACE1 is one of the two enzymes that cleave amyloid precursor protein to generate Alzheimer's disease (AD) beta amyloid peptides. It is widely believed that BACE1 initiates APP processing in endosomes, and in the brain this cleavage is known to occur during axonal transport of APP. In addition, BACE1 accumulates in dystrophic neurites surrounding brain senile plaques in individuals with AD, suggesting that abnormal accumulation of BACE1 at presynaptic terminals contributes to pathogenesis in AD. However, only limited information is available on BACE1 axonal transport and targeting.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 97 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 29%
Researcher 23 23%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 14 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 35 35%
Neuroscience 24 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 5%
Other 5 5%
Unknown 12 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#1,969,525
of 24,641,620 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#200
of 925 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,488
of 316,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Neurodegeneration
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,641,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 925 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,388 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.