You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mammalian conserved ADAR targets comprise only a small fragment of the human editosome
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-1-r5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yishay Pinto, Haim Y Cohen, Erez Y Levanon |
| Abstract |
ADAR proteins are among the most extensively studied RNA binding proteins. They bind to their target and deaminate specific adenosines to inosines. ADAR activity is essential, and the editing of a subset of their targets is critical for viability. Recently, a huge number of novel ADAR targets were detected by analyzing next generation sequencing data. Most of these novel editing sites are located in lineage-specific genomic repeats, probably a result of overactivity of editing enzymes, thus masking the functional sites. In this study we aim to identify the set of mammalian conserved ADAR targets. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 7% |
| Brazil | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 43% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 150 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 26% |
| Researcher | 33 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 13% |
| Unknown | 22 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 45% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 39 | 25% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 23 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2017.
All research outputs
#389,284
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#195
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,649
of 318,511 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#3
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,511 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.