↓ Skip to main content

Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
201 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
155 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clear obstacles and hidden challenges: understanding recruiter perspectives in six pragmatic randomised controlled trials
Published in
Trials, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jenny L Donovan, Sangeetha Paramasivan, Isabel de Salis, Merran Toerien

Abstract

Recruitment of sufficient participants in an efficient manner is still widely acknowledged to be a major challenge to the mounting and completion of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). Few recruitment interventions have involved staff undertaking recruitment. This study aimed i) to understand the recruitment process from the perspective of recruiters actively recruiting RCT participants in six pragmatic RCTs, and ii) to identify opportunities for interventions to improve recruitment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 151 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 38 25%
Student > Master 27 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Bachelor 12 8%
Other 10 6%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 48 31%
Social Sciences 19 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 12%
Psychology 10 6%
Computer Science 6 4%
Other 26 17%
Unknown 28 18%