↓ Skip to main content

RIP-seq analysis of eukaryotic Sm proteins identifies three major categories of Sm-containing ribonucleoproteins

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
35 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
146 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
RIP-seq analysis of eukaryotic Sm proteins identifies three major categories of Sm-containing ribonucleoproteins
Published in
Genome Biology, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/gb-2014-15-1-r7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhipeng Lu, Xiaojun Guan, Casey A Schmidt, A Gregory Matera

Abstract

Sm proteins are multimeric RNA-binding factors, found in all three domains of life. Eukaryotic Sm proteins, together with their associated RNAs, form small ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complexes important in multiple aspects of gene regulation. Comprehensive knowledge of the RNA components of Sm RNPs is critical for understanding their functions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 146 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Italy 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Argentina 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 138 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 29%
Researcher 33 23%
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 8 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 33 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 3%
Computer Science 3 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 9 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2016.
All research outputs
#2,752,049
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#2,147
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,684
of 318,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#57
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.