↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Elaboration of a nomogram to predict nonsentinel node status in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel node, intraoperatively assessed with one step nucleic amplification…

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Elaboration of a nomogram to predict nonsentinel node status in breast cancer patients with positive sentinel node, intraoperatively assessed with one step nucleic amplification: Retrospective and validation phase
Published in
Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13046-017-0540-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Franco Di Filippo, Simona Di Filippo, Anna Maria Ferrari, Raffaele Antonetti, Alessandro Battaglia, Francesca Becherini, Laia Bernet, Renzo Boldorini, Catherine Bouteille, Simonetta Buglioni, Paolo Burelli, Rafael Cano, Vincenzo Canzonieri, Pierluigi Chiodera, Alfredo Cirilli, Luigi Coppola, Stefano Drago, Luca Di Tommaso, Privato Fenaroli, Roberto Franchini, Andrea Gianatti, Diana Giannarelli, Carmela Giardina, Florence Godey, Massimo M. Grassi, Giuseppe B. Grassi, Siobhan Laws, Samuele Massarut, Giuseppe Naccarato, Maria Iole Natalicchio, Sergio Orefice, Fabrizio Palmieri, Tiziana Perin, Manuela Roncella, Massimo G. Roncalli, Antonio Rulli, Angelo Sidoni, Corrado Tinterri, Maria C. Truglia, Isabella Sperduti

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 20%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 10%
Researcher 1 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 30%
Neuroscience 1 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#1,969
of 2,380 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,690
of 325,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research
#19
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,380 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.