You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability of team-based self-monitoring in critical events: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Emergency Medicine, December 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-227x-13-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martin Stocker, Lynda Menadue, Suzan Kakat, Kumi De Costa, Julie Combes, Winston Banya, Mary Lane, Ajay Desai, Margarita Burmester |
| Abstract |
Teamwork is a critical component during critical events. Assessment is mandatory for remediation and to target training programmes for observed performance gaps. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Poland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 60 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 19% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Researcher | 6 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 31% |
| Unknown | 8 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 53% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 10 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2014.
All research outputs
#18,359,382
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#567
of 747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,160
of 307,159 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#11
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 307,159 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.