You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
High-volume hemofiltration for septic acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Edward Clark, Amber O Molnar, Olivier Joannes-Boyau, Patrick M Honoré, Lindsey Sikora, Sean M Bagshaw |
| Abstract |
High-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) is an attractive therapy for the treatment of septic acute kidney injury (AKI). Small experimental and uncontrolled studies have suggested hemodynamic and survival benefits at higher doses of HVHF than those used for the high-intensity arms of the RENAL and ATN studies. Our aim was to evaluate the effects of high-volume hemofiltration (HVHF) compared with standard-volume hemofiltration (SVHF) for septic AKI. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Argentina | 1 | 11% |
| Greece | 1 | 11% |
| Italy | 1 | 11% |
| France | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 2 | 22% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 44% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 124 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 11% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 9% |
| Other | 39 | 30% |
| Unknown | 24 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 78 | 60% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 2% |
| Psychology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 28 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2015.
All research outputs
#2,141,743
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,902
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,763
of 318,741 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#8
of 90 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 318,741 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 90 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.