You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hybridisation between two cyprinid fishes in a novel habitat: genetics, morphology and life-history traits
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Ecology and Evolution, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2148-10-169 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian Hayden, Domitilla Pulcini, Mary Kelly-Quinn, Martin O'Grady, Joe Caffrey, Aisling McGrath, Stefano Mariani |
| Abstract |
The potential role hybridisation in adaptive radiation and the evolution of new lineages has received much recent attention. Hybridisation between roach (Rutilus rutilus L.) and bream (Abramis brama L.) is well documented throughout Europe, however hybrids in Ireland occur at an unprecedented frequency, often exceeding that of both parental species. Utilising an integrated approach, which incorporates geometric morphometrics, life history and molecular genetic analyses we identify the levels and processes of hybridisation present, while also determining the direction of hybridisation, through the analysis of mitochondrial DNA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 122 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 113 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 31 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 16% |
| Unknown | 10 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 86 | 70% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Sports and Recreations | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 September 2022.
All research outputs
#17,285,668
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#2,929
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#85,996
of 104,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#40
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.