↓ Skip to main content

Pain patterns and descriptions in patients with radicular pain: Does the pain necessarily follow a specific dermatome?

Overview of attention for article published in Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, September 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
58 X users
facebook
45 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
4 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
293 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pain patterns and descriptions in patients with radicular pain: Does the pain necessarily follow a specific dermatome?
Published in
Chiropractic & Manual Therapies, September 2009
DOI 10.1186/1746-1340-17-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Donald R Murphy, Eric L Hurwitz, Jonathan K Gerrard, Ronald Clary

Abstract

It is commonly stated that nerve root pain should be expected to follow a specific dermatome and that this information is useful to make the diagnosis of radiculopathy. There is little evidence in the literature that confirms or denies this statement. The purpose of this study is to describe and discuss the diagnostic utility of the distribution of pain in patients with cervical and lumbar radicular pain.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 58 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 293 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 6 2%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 281 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 56 19%
Student > Bachelor 52 18%
Other 30 10%
Student > Postgraduate 27 9%
Researcher 22 8%
Other 48 16%
Unknown 58 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 110 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 69 24%
Sports and Recreations 17 6%
Neuroscience 9 3%
Engineering 6 2%
Other 22 8%
Unknown 60 20%