↓ Skip to main content

Advance telephone calls ahead of reminder questionnaires increase response rate in non-responders compared to questionnaire reminders only: The RECORD phone trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Advance telephone calls ahead of reminder questionnaires increase response rate in non-responders compared to questionnaire reminders only: The RECORD phone trial
Published in
Trials, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1745-6215-15-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Graeme MacLennan, Alison McDonald, Gladys McPherson, Shaun Treweek, Alison Avenell, the RECORD Trial Group

Abstract

Postal questionnaires are simple and economical for collecting outcome data for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) but are prone to non-response. In the RECORD trial (a large pragmatic publicly funded RCT in UK) non-responders were sent a reminder and another questionnaire at 1 year, of which 40% were returned. In subsequent years we investigated the effect of an advance telephone call to non-responders on responses rate to reminder questionnaires and the next questionnaire 4 months later.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Master 4 10%
Other 3 7%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 31%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 16 38%