You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Service users’ perspectives in the design of an online tool for assisted self-help in mental health: a case study of implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-4458-8-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Deede Gammon, Monica Strand, Lillian Sofie Eng |
| Abstract |
The involvement of persons with lived experiences of mental illness and service use is increasingly viewed as key to improving the relevance and utility of mental health research and service innovation. Guided by the principles of Community-Based Participatory Research we developed an online tool for assisted self-help in mental health. The resulting tool, PsyConnect, is ready for testing in two communities starting 2014. This case study reports from the design phase which entailed clarifying very basic questions: Who is the primary target group? What are the aims? What functions are priorities? Roles and responsibilities? What types of evidence can legitimize tool design decisions? Here we highlight the views of service users as a basis for discussing implications of user involvement for service design and research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 155 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sierra Leone | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 152 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Researcher | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 26 | 17% |
| Unknown | 30 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 35 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 18 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 34 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2016.
All research outputs
#6,715,333
of 24,673,288 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#383
of 746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,036
of 316,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#6
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,673,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 746 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,350 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.