↓ Skip to main content

Recognition of a structural domain (RWDBD) in Gcn1 proteins that interacts with the RWD domain containing proteins

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Recognition of a structural domain (RWDBD) in Gcn1 proteins that interacts with the RWD domain containing proteins
Published in
Biology Direct, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13062-017-0184-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ramachandran Rakesh, Rangachari Krishnan, Evelyn Sattlegger, Narayanaswamy Srinivasan

Abstract

The protein Gcn1 (General control non-derepressible 1) is found in virtually all eukaryotes, and is a key component of the general amino acid control signal transduction pathway. This pathway is best known for its importance for cells to sense and overcome amino acid starvation. Gcn1 directly binds to the RWD (RING finger-containing proteins, WD-repeat-containing proteins, and yeast DEAD (DEXD)-like helicases) domain of the protein kinase Gcn2, and this is essential for delivering the starvation signal to Gcn2. Gcn2, and thus the GAAC (General Amino Acid Control) pathway, then becomes activated enabling the cell to cope and overcome the starvation condition. Using sensitive homology detection and fold recognition methods a conserved structural domain in Gcn1, RWD Binding Domain (RWDBD), has been recognized that encompasses the region experimentally shown previously to be involved in Gcn2 binding. Further, the structural fold for this domain has been recognized as the ARM (Armadillo) domain, and residues likely to be involved in the binding of Gcn2 RWD domain have been identified within this structural domain. Thus, the current analysis provides a structural basis of Gcn1-Gcn2 association. This article was reviewed by Dr Oliviero Carugo and Dr Michael Gromiha.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 36%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Master 2 9%
Student > Postgraduate 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 36%
Unknown 5 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 May 2017.
All research outputs
#15,869,392
of 23,574,345 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#375
of 493 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,724
of 313,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,574,345 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 493 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.8. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,615 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.