You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bench-to-bedside review: Bacterial pneumonia with influenza - pathogenesis and clinical implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, April 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc8893 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Koenraad F van der Sluijs, Tom van der Poll, René Lutter, Nicole P Juffermans, Marcus J Schultz |
| Abstract |
Seasonal and pandemic influenza are frequently complicated by bacterial infections, causing additional hospitalization and mortality. Secondary bacterial respiratory infection can be subdivided into combined viral/bacterial pneumonia and post-influenza pneumonia, which differ in their pathogenesis. During combined viral/bacterial infection, the virus, the bacterium and the host interact with each other. Post-influenza pneumonia may, at least in part, be due to resolution of inflammation caused by the primary viral infection. These mechanisms restore tissue homeostasis but greatly impair the host response against unrelated bacterial pathogens. In this review we summarize the underlying mechanisms leading to combined viral/bacterial infection or post-influenza pneumonia and highlight important considerations for effective treatment of bacterial pneumonia during and shortly after influenza. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 30% |
| Mexico | 2 | 7% |
| Comoros | 1 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
| Denmark | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 18 | 60% |
| Scientists | 7 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 2% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| Thailand | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 177 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 17% |
| Researcher | 30 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 10% |
| Other | 40 | 22% |
| Unknown | 26 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 72 | 39% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 17% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 22 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 5% |
| Unknown | 37 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,516,655
of 25,501,527 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,333
of 6,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,996
of 102,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,501,527 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,576 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 102,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.