↓ Skip to main content

Contribution of natural antisense transcription to an endogenous siRNA signature in human cells

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
67 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contribution of natural antisense transcription to an endogenous siRNA signature in human cells
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2164-15-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andreas Werner, Simon Cockell, Jane Falconer, Mark Carlile, Sammer Alnumeir, John Robinson

Abstract

Eukaryotic cells express a complex layer of noncoding RNAs. An intriguing family of regulatory RNAs includes transcripts from the opposite strand of protein coding genes, so called natural antisense transcripts (NATs). Here, we test the hypothesis that antisense transcription triggers RNA interference and gives rise to endogenous short RNAs (endo-siRNAs).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Italy 1 1%
Luxembourg 1 1%
Unknown 64 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 31%
Researcher 17 25%
Student > Master 8 12%
Professor 4 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 3%
Other 7 10%
Unknown 8 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 39%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Computer Science 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 8 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2014.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#6,569
of 11,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,234
of 320,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#121
of 213 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,244 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,221 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 213 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.