You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Neurological impairment among heterozygote women for X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy: a case control study on a clinical, neurophysiological and biochemical characteristics
|
---|---|
Published in |
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1750-1172-9-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Clarissa Troller Habekost, Pedro Schestatsky, Vitor Felix Torres, Daniella Moura de Coelho, Carmen Regla Vargas, Vitor Torrez, Jean Pierre Oses, Luis Valmor Portela, Fernanda dos Santos Pereira, Ursula Matte, Laura Bannach Jardim |
Abstract |
Neurologic impairments in female heterozygotes for X-linked Adrenoleukodystrophy (X-ALD) are poorly understood. Our aims were to describe the neurological and neurophysiological manifestations of a cohort of X-ALD heterozygotes, and to correlate them with age, disease duration, mutations, X-inactivation and serum concentrations of a marker of neuronal damage, neuron-specific enolase (NSE). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 21% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 17% |
Researcher | 7 | 17% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 5% |
Other | 6 | 14% |
Unknown | 9 | 21% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 24% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 14% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
Neuroscience | 5 | 12% |
Psychology | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 12% |
Unknown | 10 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2014.
All research outputs
#13,833,725
of 24,164,942 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#1,358
of 2,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#165,325
of 315,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#33
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,164,942 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,413 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.