You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Child undernutrition in Kenya: trend analyses from 1993 to 2008–09
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2431-14-5 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Dennis J Matanda, Maurice B Mittelmark, Dorcus Mbithe D Kigaru |
Abstract |
Research on trends in child undernutrition in Kenya has been hindered by the challenges of changing criteria for classifying undernutrition, and an emphasis in the literature on international comparisons of countries' situations. There has been little attention to within-country trend analyses. This paper presents child undernutrition trend analyses from 1993 to 2008-09, using the 2006 WHO criteria for undernutrition. The analyses are decomposed by child's sex and age, and by maternal education level, household Wealth Index, and province, to reveal any departures from the overall national trends. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 3 | 50% |
Nigeria | 1 | 17% |
Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 144 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 32 | 22% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
Researcher | 12 | 8% |
Lecturer | 11 | 8% |
Other | 26 | 18% |
Unknown | 35 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 26 | 18% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 15% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 10% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 4% |
Other | 18 | 12% |
Unknown | 40 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2014.
All research outputs
#7,530,449
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,379
of 3,143 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,575
of 312,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#17
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,143 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.