↓ Skip to main content

Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition may reduce diastolic function in women with ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition may reduce diastolic function in women with ischemia but no obstructive coronary artery disease
Published in
Journal of Medical Case Reports, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13256-017-1307-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael D. Nelson, Puja K. Mehta, Janet Wei, Behzad Sharif, Louise E. J. Thomson, Daniel Berman, Debiao Li, C. Noel Bairey Merz

Abstract

Ischemia, in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease, is prevalent in women, and associated with increased risk for major cardiovascular events. Coronary microvascular dysfunction is prevalent in these patients, and associated with impaired diastolic function. Despite our general understanding, however, optimal treatment of this cohort remains elusive. To address this knowledge gap, we performed an open-label treatment trial to assess whether phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition improves coronary microvascular perfusion and diastolic function in women with signs and symptoms of ischemia but no evidence of obstructive coronary artery disease. Left ventricular morphology and function, along with myocardial perfusion reserve index, were assessed by contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. A total of five women enrolled of which four completed the trial, while one was withdrawn by the investigators after developing dyspnea 1 week after treatment. Her symptoms resolved after cessation of the study medication. In contrast to our hypothesis, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition reduced the rate of circumferential strain in diastole in all four women who completed the trial (that is, diastolic dysfunction). This impairment could not be explained by changes in heart rate, contractility, blood pressure, or preload, and was not associated with a change in myocardial perfusion reserve index. Frequency of angina also tended to increase with treatment, with the greatest increase occurring in the patient with the greatest impairment in diastolic strain. Taken together, these data question the efficacy of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition to treat women with ischemic heart disease, and highlight the need for further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 17%
Student > Master 2 17%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Unknown 7 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,548,834
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#2,276
of 3,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,047
of 313,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Medical Case Reports
#46
of 89 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 89 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.