You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The various aspects of genetic and epigenetic toxicology: testing methods and clinical applications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, May 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-017-1218-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ning Ren, Manar Atyah, Wan-Yong Chen, Chen-Hao Zhou |
| Abstract |
Genotoxicity refers to the ability of harmful substances to damage genetic information in cells. Being exposed to chemical and biological agents can result in genomic instabilities and/or epigenetic alterations, which translate into a variety of diseases, cancer included. This concise review discusses, from both a genetic and epigenetic point of view, the current detection methods of different agents' genotoxicity, along with their basic and clinical relation to human cancer, chemotherapy, germ cells and stem cells. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| France | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 198 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 18% |
| Researcher | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 17 | 9% |
| Unknown | 79 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 41 | 21% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 16 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 6% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 10% |
| Unknown | 88 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,375,081
of 23,876,851 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#247
of 4,236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,932
of 316,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#10
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,876,851 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.