↓ Skip to main content

Contrasting patterns of nucleotide polymorphism suggest different selective regimes within different parts of the PgiC1 gene in Festuca ovina L.

Overview of attention for article published in Hereditas, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Contrasting patterns of nucleotide polymorphism suggest different selective regimes within different parts of the PgiC1 gene in Festuca ovina L.
Published in
Hereditas, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s41065-017-0032-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuan Li, Bengt Hansson, Lena Ghatnekar, Honor C. Prentice

Abstract

Phosphoglucose isomerase (PGI, EC 5.3.1.9) is an essential metabolic enzyme in all eukaryotes. An earlier study of the PgiC1 gene, which encodes cytosolic PGI in the grass Festuca ovina L., revealed a marked difference in the levels of nucleotide polymorphism between the 5' and 3' portions of the gene. In the present study, we characterized the sequence polymorphism in F. ovina PgiC1 in more detail and examined possible explanations for the non-uniform pattern of nucleotide polymorphism across the gene. Our study confirms that the two portions of the PgiC1 gene show substantially different levels of DNA polymorphism and also suggests that the peptide encoded by the 3' portion of PgiC1 is functionally and structurally more important than that encoded by the 5' portion. Although there was some evidence of purifying selection (dN/dS test) on the 5' portion of the gene, the signature of purifying selection was considerably stronger on the 3' portion of the gene (dN/dS and McDonald-Kreitman tests). Several tests support the action of balancing selection within the 5' portion of the gene. Wall's B and Q tests were significant only for the 5' portion of the gene. There were also marked peaks of nucleotide diversity, Tajima's D and the dN/dS ratio at or around a PgiC1 codon site (within the 5' portion of the gene) that a previous study had suggested was subject to positive diversifying selection. Our results suggest that the two portions of the gene have been subject to different selective regimes. Purifying selection appears to have been the main force contributing to the relatively low level of polymorphism within the 3' portion of the sequence. In contrast, it is possible that balancing selection has contributed to the maintenance of the polymorphism within the 5' portion of the gene.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Lecturer 1 17%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2017.
All research outputs
#22,764,772
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Hereditas
#444
of 513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,197
of 326,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditas
#6
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 513 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.