↓ Skip to main content

Comparing key characteristics of young adult crack users in and out-of-treatment in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
81 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing key characteristics of young adult crack users in and out-of-treatment in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1747-597x-9-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marcelo Cruz, Neilane Bertoni, Francisco I Bastos, Chantal Burnett, Jenna Gooch, Benedikt Fischer

Abstract

Crack use is prevalent among street drug users in Brazilian cities, yet despite recent help system reforms and investments, treatment utilization is low. Other studies have identified a variety of - often inconsistent - factors associated with treatment status among crack or other drug users. This study compared socio-economic, drug use, health and service use characteristics between samples of young adult crack users in- and out-of-treatment in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
Portugal 1 1%
Unknown 78 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 17 21%
Unknown 23 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 19%
Psychology 9 11%
Social Sciences 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 5%
Other 13 16%
Unknown 28 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2016.
All research outputs
#2,175,539
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#93
of 666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,797
of 304,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.