↓ Skip to main content

Dating the diversification of the major lineages of Passeriformes (Aves)

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
8 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
148 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dating the diversification of the major lineages of Passeriformes (Aves)
Published in
BMC Ecology and Evolution, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2148-14-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Per GP Ericson, Seraina Klopfstein, Martin Irestedt, Jacqueline MT Nguyen, Johan AA Nylander

Abstract

The avian Order Passeriformes is an enormously species-rich group, which comprises almost 60% of all living bird species. This diverse order is believed to have originated before the break-up of Gondwana in the late Cretaceous. However, previous molecular dating studies have relied heavily on the geological split between New Zealand and Antarctica, assumed to have occurred 85-82 Mya, for calibrating the molecular clock and might thus be circular in their argument.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 148 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
United States 4 3%
Germany 2 1%
Chile 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 133 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 19%
Student > Master 25 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Other 20 14%
Unknown 26 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 87 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 8%
Environmental Science 6 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 3 2%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 30 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 February 2023.
All research outputs
#1,634,189
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#383
of 3,714 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,104
of 336,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,714 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.