You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa serotypes in nosocomial pneumonia: prevalence and clinical outcomes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13697 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qin Lu, Philippe Eggimann, Charles-Edouard Luyt, Michel Wolff, Michael Tamm, Bruno François, Emmanuelle Mercier, Jorge Garbino, Pierre-François Laterre, Holger Koch, Verena Gafner, Michael P Rudolf, Erkan Mus, Antonio Perez, Hedvika Lazar, Jean Chastre, Jean-Jacques Rouby |
| Abstract |
Pseudomonas aeruginosa frequently causes nosocomial pneumonia and is associated with poor outcome. The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence and clinical outcome of nosocomial pneumonia caused by serotype specific Pseudomonas aeruginosa in critically ill patients under appropriate antimicrobial therapy management. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 2 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 2 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 20% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 19 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 14% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 13 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Unknown | 26 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2014.
All research outputs
#8,698,306
of 25,773,273 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,443
of 6,618 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,099
of 339,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#53
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,773,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,618 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 339,066 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.