↓ Skip to main content

Comparing the accuracy of brief versus long depression screening instruments which have been validated in low and middle income countries: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
84 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
174 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparing the accuracy of brief versus long depression screening instruments which have been validated in low and middle income countries: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-187
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dickens Akena, John Joska, Ekwaro A Obuku, Taryn Amos, Seggane Musisi, Dan J Stein

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 174 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
South Africa 2 1%
Nigeria 2 1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 167 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 16%
Researcher 26 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 13%
Student > Postgraduate 14 8%
Other 12 7%
Other 36 21%
Unknown 36 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 58 33%
Psychology 34 20%
Social Sciences 18 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 3%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 18 10%
Unknown 37 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2019.
All research outputs
#7,528,244
of 22,973,051 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#2,524
of 4,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,661
of 184,880 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#38
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,973,051 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.9. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,880 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.