↓ Skip to main content

Hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin: clinical features and risk factors

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hypersensitivity to oxaliplatin: clinical features and risk factors
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/2050-6511-15-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marie Parel, Florence Ranchon, Audrey Nosbaum, Benoit You, Nicolas Vantard, Vérane Schwiertz, Chloé Gourc, Noémie Gauthier, Marie-Gabrielle Guedat, Sophie He, Eléna Kiouris, Céline Alloux, Thierry Vial, Véronique Trillet-Lenoir, Gilles Freyer, Frédéric Berard, Catherine Rioufol

Abstract

Oxaliplatin-based regimens induce a potential risk of hypersensitivity reaction (HSR), with incidence varying from 10% to 25% and lack of clearly identified risk factors. The present study aimed to assess incidence and risk factors in HSR.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Korea, Republic of 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 34 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 25%
Student > Master 5 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Other 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 9 25%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 42%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Social Sciences 2 6%
Computer Science 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 5 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 July 2019.
All research outputs
#4,497,301
of 18,617,809 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#76
of 364 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,115
of 325,885 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#10
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,617,809 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 364 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,885 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.