↓ Skip to main content

Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Assessing the quality of reports of systematic reviews in pediatric complementary and alternative medicine
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2002
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-2-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Moher, Karen Soeken, Margaret Sampson, Leah Ben-Porat, Brian Berman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 6%
Ireland 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 47 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Student > Master 8 15%
Librarian 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 19 37%
Social Sciences 6 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 2 4%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 12 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2005.
All research outputs
#7,528,880
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#1,395
of 3,030 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,312
of 45,705 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,030 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 45,705 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them