↓ Skip to main content

Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the clinical outcome of comatose survivors after cardiac arrest: a cohort study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
96 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for predicting the clinical outcome of comatose survivors after cardiac arrest: a cohort study
Published in
Critical Care, February 2010
DOI 10.1186/cc8874
Pubmed ID
Authors

Seung Pill Choi, Kyu Nam Park, Hae Kwan Park, Jee Young Kim, Chun Song Youn, Kook Jin Ahn, Hyeon Woo Yim

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 4%
United Kingdom 3 3%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Belgium 1 1%
Unknown 86 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 20 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Researcher 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 8%
Other 27 28%
Unknown 8 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 63 66%
Engineering 6 6%
Neuroscience 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Unspecified 1 1%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2015.
All research outputs
#8,534,976
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,396
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,254
of 174,883 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#23
of 56 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 174,883 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 56 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.