↓ Skip to main content

The use of annual physical examinations among the elderly in rural China: a cross-sectional study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
38 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The use of annual physical examinations among the elderly in rural China: a cross-sectional study
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-16
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xi Sun, Yingchun Chen, Xuetao Tong, Zhanchun Feng, Li Wei, Donghua Zhou, Miaomiao Tian, Benyan Lv, Da Feng

Abstract

Periodic physical examination is considered helpful in preventing illness and promoting health among the elderly. Limited information is available about the use of annual physical examinations among the elderly in rural areas, however. This research explores the distribution characteristics of annual physical examination use and its determinants among people aged 60 or over in rural China.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Unknown 52 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 17%
Researcher 4 8%
Lecturer 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 6%
Other 3 6%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 22 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 9 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 11%
Social Sciences 6 11%
Arts and Humanities 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 24 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2014.
All research outputs
#15,457,849
of 23,934,148 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,601
of 8,014 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,465
of 313,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#85
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,934,148 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,014 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,473 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.