↓ Skip to main content

A disease similarity matrix based on the uniqueness of shared genes

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Genomics, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
19 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A disease similarity matrix based on the uniqueness of shared genes
Published in
BMC Medical Genomics, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12920-017-0265-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew B. Carson, Cong Liu, Yao Lu, Caiyan Jia, Hui Lu

Abstract

Complex diseases involve many genes, and these genes are often associated with several different illnesses. Disease similarity measurement can be based on shared genotype or phenotype. Quantifying relationships between genes can reveal previously unknown connections and form a reference base for therapy development and drug repurposing. Here we introduce a method to measure disease similarity that incorporates the uniqueness of shared genes. For each disease pair, we calculated the uniqueness score and constructed disease similarity matrices using OMIM and Disease Ontology annotation. Using the Disease Ontology-based matrix, we identified several interesting connections between cancer and other disease and conditions such as malaria, along with studies to support our findings. We also found several high scoring pairwise relationships for which there was little or no literature support, highlighting potentially interesting connections warranting additional study. We developed a co-occurrence matrix based on gene uniqueness to examine the relationships between diseases from OMIM and DORIF data. Our similarity matrix can be used to identify potential disease relationships and to motivate further studies investigating the causal mechanisms in diseases.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 19 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 4 21%
Student > Master 3 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 11%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 4 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Arts and Humanities 1 5%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2017.
All research outputs
#13,202,765
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Genomics
#471
of 1,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,356
of 313,660 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Genomics
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,229 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 313,660 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.