↓ Skip to main content

Review of pharmacological therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
127 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
199 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Review of pharmacological therapies in fibromyalgia syndrome
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/ar4441
Pubmed ID
Authors

Winfried Häuser, Brian Walitt, Mary-Ann Fitzcharles, Claudia Sommer

Abstract

This review addresses the current status of drug therapy for the management of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and is based on interdisciplinary FMS management guidelines, meta-analyses of drug trial data, and observational studies. In the absence of a single gold-standard medication, patients are treated with a variety of drugs from different categories, often with limited evidence. Drug therapy is not mandatory for the management of FMS. Pregabalin, duloxetine, milnacipran, and amitriptyline are the current first-line prescribed agents but have had a mostly modest effect. With only a minority of patients expected to experience substantial benefit, most will discontinue therapy because of either a lack of efficacy or tolerability problems. Many drug treatments have undergone limited study and have had negative results. It is unlikely that these failed pilot trials will undergo future study. However, medications, though imperfect, will continue to be a component of treatment strategy for these patients. Both the potential for medication therapy to relieve symptoms and the potential to cause harm should be carefully considered in their administration.The desire to take medicine is perhaps the greatest feature which distinguishes man from animals.Sir William Osler (1849-1919).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 199 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 196 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 30 15%
Researcher 25 13%
Other 22 11%
Student > Master 18 9%
Student > Postgraduate 15 8%
Other 37 19%
Unknown 52 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 10%
Psychology 12 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 55 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 November 2019.
All research outputs
#2,023,165
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#326
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,722
of 320,076 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#5
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,076 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.