You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Dengue-specific subviral nanoparticles: design, creation and characterization
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Nanobiotechnology, May 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1477-3155-11-15 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niyati Khetarpal, Ankur Poddar, Satish K Nemani, Nisha Dhar, Aravind Patil, Priyanka Negi, Ashiya Perween, Ramaswamy Viswanathan, Heinrich Lünsdorf, Poornima Tyagi, Rajendra Raut, Upasana Arora, Swatantra K Jain, Ursula Rinas, Sathyamangalam Swaminathan, Navin Khanna |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 26% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 21% |
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Professor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 13 | 22% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 13 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,393,991
of 22,974,684 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#67
of 1,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,364
of 195,684 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Nanobiotechnology
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,974,684 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,429 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,684 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them