↓ Skip to main content

A multicenter, prospective validation study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system in patients with severe sepsis

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, June 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A multicenter, prospective validation study of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine disseminated intravascular coagulation scoring system in patients with severe sepsis
Published in
Critical Care, June 2013
DOI 10.1186/cc12783
Pubmed ID
Authors

Satoshi Gando, Daizoh Saitoh, Hiroshi Ogura, Seitaro Fujishima, Toshihiko Mayumi, Tsunetoshi Araki, Hiroto Ikeda, Joji Kotani, Shigeki Kushimoto, Yasuo Miki, Shin-ichiro Shiraishi, Koichiro Suzuki, Yasushi Suzuki, Naoshi Takeyama, Kiyotsugu Takuma, Ryosuke Tsuruta, Yoshihiro Yamaguchi, Norio Yamashita, Naoki Aikawa, Japanese Association for Acute Medicine Sepsis Registry Study Group

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 86 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 12 13%
Researcher 11 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 11%
Student > Postgraduate 10 11%
Student > Master 10 11%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 17 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 56%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 3 3%
Unspecified 2 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 21 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2017.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,397
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,356
of 209,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#49
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.