You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Histopathological diagnosis of myocarditis in a dengue outbreak in Sri Lanka, 2009
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Research Notes, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1756-0500-4-268 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kosala GAD Weerakoon, Senanayake AM Kularatne, Deepthika H Edussuriya, Sarachchandra KA Kodikara, Laxman PG Gunatilake, Vasanti G Pinto, Ashoka B Seneviratne, Sunethra Gunasena |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 74 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Researcher | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 26% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 57% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 15% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2022.
All research outputs
#6,903,999
of 24,527,858 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#1,030
of 4,416 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,817
of 122,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#20
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,527,858 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,416 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 122,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.