You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding practice: the factors that influence management of mild traumatic brain injury in the emergency department-a qualitative study using the Theoretical Domains Framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Emma J Tavender, Marije Bosch, Russell L Gruen, Sally E Green, Jonathan Knott, Jill J Francis, Susan Michie, Denise A O’Connor |
| Abstract |
Mild traumatic brain injury is a frequent cause of presentation to emergency departments. Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines in this area, there is variation in practice. One of the aims of the Neurotrauma Evidence Translation program is to develop and evaluate a targeted, theory- and evidence-informed intervention to improve the management of mild traumatic brain injury in Australian emergency departments. This study is the first step in the intervention development process and uses the Theoretical Domains Framework to explore the factors perceived to influence the uptake of four key evidence-based recommended practices for managing mild traumatic brain injury. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 183 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 15% |
| Researcher | 26 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 22% |
| Unknown | 41 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 55 | 29% |
| Psychology | 22 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 7% |
| Sports and Recreations | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 11% |
| Unknown | 55 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 January 2016.
All research outputs
#13,400,446
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,413
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,214
of 306,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 306,020 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.