You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Giving cell phones to pregnant women and improving services may increase primary health facility utilization: a case–control study of a Nigerian project
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Reproductive Health, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-4755-11-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sunday Oluwafemi Oyeyemi, Rolf Wynn |
| Abstract |
Worldwide, about 287 000 women die each year from mostly preventable complications related to pregnancy and childbirth. A disproportionately high number of these deaths occur in sub-Saharan Africa. The Abiye ('Safe Motherhood') project in the Ifedore Local Government Area (LGA) of Ondo-State of Nigeria aimed at improving facility utilization and maternal health through the use of cell phones and generally improved health care services for pregnant women, including Health Rangers, renovated Health Centres, and improved means of transportation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 33% |
| Ireland | 1 | 5% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 5% |
| Sri Lanka | 1 | 5% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 16 | 76% |
| Scientists | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 242 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 60 | 25% |
| Researcher | 31 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 19 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 7% |
| Other | 41 | 17% |
| Unknown | 53 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 64 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 32 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 32 | 13% |
| Computer Science | 11 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 40 | 16% |
| Unknown | 58 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 55. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2017.
All research outputs
#650,837
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#40
of 1,408 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,634
of 305,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#1
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,408 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.