↓ Skip to main content

Effect of aerobic exercise and low carbohydrate diet on pre-diabetic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in postmenopausal women and middle aged men – the role of gut microbiota composition: study…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
386 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Effect of aerobic exercise and low carbohydrate diet on pre-diabetic non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in postmenopausal women and middle aged men – the role of gut microbiota composition: study protocol for the AELC randomized controlled trial
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-48
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wu Yi Liu, Da Jiang Lu, Xia Ming Du, Jian Qin Sun, Jun Ge, Ren Wei Wang, Ru Wang, Jun Zou, Chang Xu, Jie Ren, Xin Fei Wen, Yang Liu, Shu Mei Cheng, Xiao Tan, Satu Pekkala, Eveliina Munukka, Petri Wiklund, Yan Qiu Chen, Qing Gu, Zheng Chang Xia, Jun Jun Liu, Wen Bin Liu, Xue Bo Chen, Yi Min Zhang, Rui Li, Ronald J H Borra, Jia Xin Yao, Pei Jie Chen, Sulin Cheng

Abstract

Pre-diabetes and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are associated with an unhealthy lifestyle and pose extremely high costs to the healthcare system. In this study, we aim to explore whether individualized aerobic exercise (AEx) and low carbohydrate diet (LCh) intervention affect hepatic fat content (HFC) in pre-diabetes via modification of gut microbiota composition and other post-interventional effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 386 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Unknown 383 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 52 13%
Student > Master 50 13%
Student > Bachelor 50 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 10%
Other 20 5%
Other 76 20%
Unknown 100 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 49 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 6%
Sports and Recreations 20 5%
Other 61 16%
Unknown 123 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2018.
All research outputs
#20,166,456
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#14,915
of 17,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,053
of 321,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#263
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.