You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A comparative study of two various models of organising diabetes follow-up in public primary health care – the model influences the use of services, their quality and costs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mikko T Honkasalo, Miika Linna, Timo Sane, Atte Honkasalo, Outi Elonheimo |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 106 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 103 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 22 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 9% |
| Researcher | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 17 | 16% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 22 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 28 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2015.
All research outputs
#14,771,194
of 22,739,983 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#5,348
of 7,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,620
of 305,475 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#88
of 120 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,739,983 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,609 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,475 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 120 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.