You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Non-invasive stroke volume measurement and passive leg raising predict volume responsiveness in medical ICU patients: an observational cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc7955 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Steven W Thiel, Marin H Kollef, Warren Isakow |
| Abstract |
The assessment of volume responsiveness and the decision to administer a fluid bolus is a common dilemma facing physicians caring for critically ill patients. Static markers of cardiac preload are poor predictors of volume responsiveness, and dynamic markers are often limited by the presence of spontaneous respirations or cardiac arrhythmias. Passive leg raising (PLR) represents an endogenous volume challenge that can be used to predict fluid responsiveness. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 33% |
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 15% |
| Other | 23 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 12% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 24% |
| Unknown | 19 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 111 | 69% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 2% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 4% |
| Unknown | 24 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2016.
All research outputs
#15,518,326
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#5,089
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,650
of 121,789 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#17
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 121,789 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.