You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Prevalence of neurological conditions across the continuum of care based on interRAI assessments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6963-14-29 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oana Danila, John P Hirdes, Colleen J Maxwell, Ruth Ann Marrie, Scott Patten, Tamara Pringsheim, Nathalie Jetté |
| Abstract |
Although multiple studies have estimated the prevalence of neurological conditions in the general Canadian population, limited research exists regarding the proportion affected with these conditions in non-acute health care settings in Canada. Data from standardized clinical assessments based on the interRAI suite of instruments were used to estimate the prevalence of eight neurological conditions across the continuum of care including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, epilepsy, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, cerebral palsy, Huntington's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Ireland | 5 | 56% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 138 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 18 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 13 | 9% |
| Other | 28 | 20% |
| Unknown | 34 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 35 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 21 | 15% |
| Psychology | 10 | 7% |
| Neuroscience | 6 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 4% |
| Other | 20 | 14% |
| Unknown | 44 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2017.
All research outputs
#5,024,192
of 24,666,614 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,386
of 8,342 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,666
of 316,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#30
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,666,614 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,342 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.