You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Observational study of regional aortic size referenced to body size: production of a cardiovascular magnetic resonance nomogram
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-16-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne E Davis, Adam J Lewandowski, Cameron J Holloway, Ntobeko AB Ntusi, Rajarshi Banerjee, Richard Nethononda, Alex Pitcher, Jane M Francis, Saul G Myerson, Paul Leeson, Tim Donovan, Stefan Neubauer, Oliver J Rider |
| Abstract |
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is regarded as the gold standard for clinical assessment of the aorta, but normal dimensions are usually referenced to echocardiographic and computed tomography data and no large CMR normal reference range exists. As a result we aimed to 1) produce a normal CMR reference range of aortic diameters and 2) investigate the relationship between regional aortic size and body surface area (BSA) in a large group of healthy subjects with no vascular risk factors. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Egypt | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 108 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 21 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 28 | 24% |
| Unknown | 25 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 57% |
| Engineering | 8 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 29 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2014.
All research outputs
#23,154,082
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#1,293
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#284,006
of 323,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#25
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 323,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.