You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Title |
On the necessity of different statistical treatment for Illumina BeadChip and Affymetrix GeneChip data and its significance for biological interpretation
|
---|---|
Published in |
Biology Direct, June 2008
|
DOI | 10.1186/1745-6150-3-23 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Wing-Cheong Wong, Marie Loh, Frank Eisenhaber |
Abstract |
The original spotted array technology with competitive hybridization of two experimental samples and measuring relative expression levels is increasingly displaced by more accurate platforms that allow determining absolute expression values for a single sample (for example, Affymetrix GeneChip and Illumina BeadChip). Unfortunately, cross-platform comparisons show a disappointingly low concordance between lists of regulated genes between the latter two platforms. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
Israel | 1 | 3% |
Switzerland | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 33 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 15 | 42% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 17% |
Other | 3 | 8% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 6% |
Other | 5 | 14% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 36% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 17% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
Mathematics | 3 | 8% |
Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
Other | 4 | 11% |
Unknown | 2 | 6% |