↓ Skip to main content

Uniting sex and eukaryote origins in an emerging oxygenic world

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, August 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#34 of 537)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
136 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Uniting sex and eukaryote origins in an emerging oxygenic world
Published in
Biology Direct, August 2010
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-5-53
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jeferson Gross, Debashish Bhattacharya

Abstract

Theories about eukaryote origins (eukaryogenesis) need to provide unified explanations for the emergence of diverse complex features that define this lineage. Models that propose a prokaryote-to-eukaryote transition are gridlocked between the opposing "phagocytosis first" and "mitochondria as seed" paradigms, neither of which fully explain the origins of eukaryote cell complexity. Sex (outcrossing with meiosis) is an example of an elaborate trait not yet satisfactorily addressed in theories about eukaryogenesis. The ancestral nature of meiosis and its dependence on eukaryote cell biology suggest that the emergence of sex and eukaryogenesis were simultaneous and synergic and may be explained by a common selective pressure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 136 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 4 3%
Belgium 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Tunisia 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 121 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 30 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 20%
Student > Bachelor 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 11 8%
Professor 9 7%
Other 22 16%
Unknown 24 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 12%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 7%
Chemistry 5 4%
Environmental Science 4 3%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 28 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,461,599
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#34
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,678
of 104,296 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#2
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,296 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.