↓ Skip to main content

Temporal order of evolution of DNA replication systems inferred by comparison of cellular and viral DNA polymerases

Overview of attention for article published in Biology Direct, December 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
101 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Temporal order of evolution of DNA replication systems inferred by comparison of cellular and viral DNA polymerases
Published in
Biology Direct, December 2006
DOI 10.1186/1745-6150-1-39
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eugene V Koonin

Abstract

The core enzymes of the DNA replication systems show striking diversity among cellular life forms and more so among viruses. In particular, and counter-intuitively, given the central role of DNA in all cells and the mechanistic uniformity of replication, the core enzymes of the replication systems of bacteria and archaea (as well as eukaryotes) are unrelated or extremely distantly related. Viruses and plasmids, in addition, possess at least two unique DNA replication systems, namely, the protein-primed and rolling circle modalities of replication. This unexpected diversity makes the origin and evolution of DNA replication systems a particularly challenging and intriguing problem in evolutionary biology.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 2%
United States 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 92 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 21%
Student > Master 11 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Professor 10 10%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 9 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 51 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 22%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 3%
Physics and Astronomy 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 13 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 January 2024.
All research outputs
#8,262,981
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biology Direct
#263
of 537 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,987
of 167,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biology Direct
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 537 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.