↓ Skip to main content

Social inclusion for children with hearing loss in listening and spoken Language early intervention: an exploratory study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, March 2017
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social inclusion for children with hearing loss in listening and spoken Language early intervention: an exploratory study
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, March 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12887-017-0823-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gabriella Constantinescu-Sharpe, Rebecca L. Phillips, Aleisha Davis, Dimity Dornan, Anthony Hogan

Abstract

Social inclusion is a common focus of listening and spoken language (LSL) early intervention for children with hearing loss. This exploratory study compared the social inclusion of young children with hearing loss educated using a listening and spoken language approach with population data. A framework for understanding the scope of social inclusion is presented in the Background. This framework guided the use of a shortened, modified version of the Longitudinal Study of Australian Children (LSAC) to measure two of the five facets of social inclusion ('education' and 'interacting with society and fulfilling social goals'). The survey was completed by parents of children with hearing loss aged 4-5 years who were educated using a LSL approach (n = 78; 37% who responded). These responses were compared to those obtained for typical hearing children in the LSAC dataset (n = 3265). Analyses revealed that most children with hearing loss had comparable outcomes to those with typical hearing on the 'education' and 'interacting with society and fulfilling social roles' facets of social inclusion. These exploratory findings are positive and warrant further investigation across all five facets of the framework to identify which factors influence social inclusion.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Researcher 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 19 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 14%
Psychology 6 11%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Linguistics 2 4%
Other 10 18%
Unknown 19 34%