↓ Skip to main content

Coverage, quality of and barriers to postnatal care in rural Hebei, China: a mixed method study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
208 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Coverage, quality of and barriers to postnatal care in rural Hebei, China: a mixed method study
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-31
Pubmed ID
Authors

Li Chen, Wu Qiong, Michelle Helena van Velthoven, Zhang Yanfeng, Zhang Shuyi, Li Ye, Wang Wei, Du Xiaozhen, Zhang Ting

Abstract

Postnatal care is an important link in the continuum of care for maternal and child health. However, coverage and quality of postnatal care are poor in low- and middle-income countries. In 2009, the Chinese government set a policy providing free postnatal care services to all mothers and their newborns in China. Our study aimed at exploring coverage, quality of care, reasons for not receiving and barriers to providing postnatal care after introduction of this new policy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 208 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 208 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 54 26%
Researcher 24 12%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 8%
Lecturer 10 5%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 47 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 22%
Social Sciences 26 13%
Psychology 9 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 5 2%
Other 18 9%
Unknown 49 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2016.
All research outputs
#6,831,341
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,909
of 4,454 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,374
of 312,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#69
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,454 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 312,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.