↓ Skip to main content

Bacteriophage–prokaryote dynamics and interaction within anaerobic digestion processes across time and space

Overview of attention for article published in Microbiome, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
17 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
71 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Bacteriophage–prokaryote dynamics and interaction within anaerobic digestion processes across time and space
Published in
Microbiome, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s40168-017-0272-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Junyu Zhang, Qun Gao, Qiuting Zhang, Tengxu Wang, Haowei Yue, Linwei Wu, Jason Shi, Ziyan Qin, Jizhong Zhou, Jiane Zuo, Yunfeng Yang

Abstract

Bacteriophage-prokaryote dynamics and interaction are believed to be important in governing microbiome composition and ecosystem functions, yet our limited knowledge of the spatial and temporal variation in phage and prokaryotic community compositions precludes accurate assessment of their roles and impacts. Anaerobic digesters are ideal model systems to examine phage-host interaction, owing to easy access, stable operation, nutrient-rich environment, and consequently enormous numbers of phages and prokaryotic cells. Equipped with high-throughput, cutting-edge environmental genomics techniques, we examined phage and prokaryotic community composition of four anaerobic digesters in full-scale wastewater treatment plants across China. Despite the relatively stable process performance in biogas production, phage and prokaryotic groups fluctuated monthly over a year of study period, showing significant correlations between those two groups at the α- and β-diversity levels. Strikingly, phages explained 40.6% of total variations of the prokaryotic community composition, much higher than the explanatory power by abiotic factors (14.5%). Consequently, phages were significantly (P < 0.010) linked to parameters related to process performance including biogas production and volatile solid concentrations. Association network analyses showed phage-prokaryote pairs were shallowly conserved since they were detected only within small viral clades. Those results collectively demonstrate phages as a major biotic factor in controlling prokaryotic composition and process performance. Therefore, phages may play a larger role in shaping prokaryotic community dynamics and process performance of anaerobic digesters than currently appreciated.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 153 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 18%
Student > Master 23 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 4%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 36 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 36 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 14%
Environmental Science 19 12%
Engineering 10 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 3%
Other 12 8%
Unknown 50 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,799,211
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Microbiome
#710
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#37,099
of 316,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbiome
#27
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 316,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.