↓ Skip to main content

Factors influencing work participation of adults with developmental dyslexia: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
41 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors influencing work participation of adults with developmental dyslexia: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-77
Pubmed ID
Authors

Joost de Beer, Josephine Engels, Yvonne Heerkens, Jac van der Klink

Abstract

Evidence has been synthesized to determine hindering and facilitating factors associated with the work participation of adults with developmental dyslexia (DD), classified according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 4 2%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 225 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 49 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Student > Bachelor 27 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 8%
Researcher 15 6%
Other 40 17%
Unknown 47 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 54 23%
Social Sciences 43 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 6%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Other 34 15%
Unknown 56 24%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 April 2015.
All research outputs
#3,643,953
of 21,361,101 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#4,071
of 13,854 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,090
of 287,600 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,361,101 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,854 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,600 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them